{"id":638,"date":"2015-10-12T14:49:40","date_gmt":"2015-10-12T14:49:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/?p=638"},"modified":"2022-06-11T20:14:22","modified_gmt":"2022-06-11T20:14:22","slug":"obergefell-equal-protection-and-due-process-convergence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/2015\/10\/12\/obergefell-equal-protection-and-due-process-convergence\/","title":{"rendered":"Obergefell: Equal Protection and Due Process Convergence?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p><em>The right of same-sex couples to marry that is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment is derived, too, from that Amendment&#8217;s guarantee of the equal protection of the laws. The Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause are connected in a profound way, though they set forth independent principles&#8230; In any particular case one Clause may be thought to capture the essence of the right in a more accurate and comprehensive way, even as the two Clauses may converge in the identification and definition of the right.\u00a0<\/em><u>Obergefell v. Hodges<\/u>, \u00a0(2015)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>In his <em>Obergefell<\/em>\u00a0majority opinion, Justice Kennedy emphasized that due process and equal protection often work together to guarantee rights and ensure against discrimination. Although\u00a0Justice Scalia <a href=\"https:\/\/casetext.com\/case\/obergefell-v-hodges?annotation-id=-K0RMb20PEgKv1_Kqqzw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">characterized this idea as &#8220;incoherent,&#8221;<\/a>\u00a0it is undeniably true that the Court has invoked both due process and equal protection together to\u00a0strike\u00a0down\u00a0discriminatory schemes in the family context. Consider the following (click to open full-sized image in a separate window):<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_653\" style=\"width: 1210px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/home.ubalt.edu\/id86mp66\/Faculty%20Share\/CatherineSmith\/EP_DP_in_Obergefell.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-653\" class=\"wp-image-653 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/273\/2015\/10\/EP_DP_in_Obergefell.jpg\" alt=\"EP_DP_in_Obergefell\" width=\"1200\" height=\"708\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-653\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">EP and DP Convergence<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The map above shows a network of cases cited by Kennedy in <em>Obergefell<\/em>\u00a0that\u00a0connect\u00a0via direct citation back to either\u00a0<em>Pierce v. Society of Sisters<\/em>\u00a0or <em>Skinner v. Oklahoma<\/em>. Note that\u00a0cases represented in blue cite back to <em>Pierce<\/em> and are generally regarded\u00a0as due process cases (<em>Pierce<\/em> is a foundational substantive due process case). Similarly, cases represented in red cite back to <em>Skinner<\/em>\u00a0and are generally regarded as equal protection cases (<em>Skinner<\/em> is a foundational equal protection case). Importantly, the Court struck down the discriminatory scheme at issue in all of the cases displayed in this network. And in most of these cases, the Court acted under\u00a0both equal protection and due process &#8212; as shown by red and blue cite lines.<\/p>\n<p>Now the network above does not represent all the precedent Kennedy cited in support of his idea of EP\/DP convergence. Rather, the map uses citations back to <em>Pierce<\/em> and\/or <em>Skinner<\/em> as a blunt proxy\u00a0of this idea. Readers interested in the details of the cases can follow the links on the map above to the underlying opinions in Casetext. Alternatively, readers can open an identical map <a href=\"http:\/\/home.ubalt.edu\/id86mp66\/Faculty%20Share\/CatherineSmith\/EP_DP_in_Obergefell_spaeth.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">at this link<\/a>, which in turn contains links to the Supreme Court Database instead of the opinions.\u00a0Together the maps provide\u00a0a useful starting point for investigations into\u00a0the convergence idea.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The right of same-sex couples to marry that is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment is derived, too, from that Amendment&#8217;s guarantee of the equal protection of the laws. The Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/2015\/10\/12\/obergefell-equal-protection-and-due-process-convergence\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":400,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/400"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=638"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":856,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638\/revisions\/856"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=638"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubalt.edu\/cstarger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}