Dionne Koller and Sports Law: A Perfect Fit

By Adam Stone 

Dion Koller

A gymnast in her youth, Dionne Koller knew intuitively what her career in the legal-academic world would look like. 

“Sports was a very important part of my life experience. When I got into academia, that led me to have an interest in sports law, to see what sports law was all about,” she says. 

But is there even such a thing as “sports law”? When Koller joined the UBalt Law faculty in 2006, the answer was a definite maybe. Since then, she has helped to put sports law on the map, and earned a reputation as one of the leading scholars in the field. 

An emerging discipline 

In the early 2000s, sports law wasn’t fully recognized within the legal academy as a separate academic discipline. “People would say: Certainly, there’s a lot of law that applies to sports — antitrust law, labor law, contract law. We apply a lot of law to sports, but there’s not a lot of law about sports,” Koller says. 

Others took a different view. There were legal scholars who felt there was important work to be done to make sports law a field. Koller saw a professional window open up in that transitional moment. “My personal love for sports intersected with an opportunity to really take on important issues,” she says. 

“When the University of Baltimore hired me, I made clear that I would want to go up for tenure with a sports law portfolio, that my scholarly record would be built on sports law and not some other recognized area,” she says. 

She’s gone on to do just that, addressing urgent issues, especially around youth participation in sports. She was quoted widely when Larry Nassar, the former U.S. Women’s Gymnastics team doctor, was convicted of abusing hundreds of athletes. She recently co-chaired the Congressional Commission on the State of United States Olympics and Paralympics, and she was a member of the Aspen Institute Sport and Society’s Children’s Rights in Sports Work Group. 

When it comes to youth sports, she says, there is much that needs fixing, and colleagues say Koller is uniquely qualified to drive those changes. 

“She has been a pioneer in her teaching and her scholarship,” says Prof. Margaret Johnson, co-director of UBalt Law’s Center on Applied Feminism and director of the Bronfein Family Law Clinic. 

Johnson notes that Koller has won the UBalt President’s Award for her teaching, scholarship and service, and has been recognized with the Association of American Law Schools’ 2024 award for significant contributions to the field of sports law. 

“She models professionalism, hard work and commitment,” Johnson says. In her work at the law school, “She sees everyone for who they are, in a way that makes everyone feel good about being together in this shared enterprise.”

Koller leads a hearing in Congress in September 2023 as chair of the Commission on the State of U.S. Olympic and Paralympics.

Focus on Youth

Koller’s first book, More Than Play: How Law, Policy, and Politics Shape American Youth Sport, is due out in 2025. 

“The book mirrors my approach to sports law generally, which is to take something that we take for granted and illuminate areas that we maybe haven’t been paying attention to,” she says. The book challenges the unspoken assumption “that youth sport is good, it’s healthy, every kid should participate.” 

The truth is somewhat more nuanced, she argues. 

From a legal standpoint, there’s an operating assumption that sports should not be regulated. That has real-world impact. “We’re over-training kids, overworking them, burning them out. It has physical consequences, and it has mental consequences,” she says. 

While Koller doesn’t lay out a program for fixing all this, she has some strong thoughts on the subject, guided in part by her understanding of how sports in other countries are regulated. 

“There are countries like Norway that do things very, very differently,” she says. “They give children some rights, meaning children can decide how much time they’re going to spend on their sport. They’re going to decide if they want to travel to compete. Children have some say.” 

A better system would also reflect the fact that “parents can’t always be neutral judges or arbiters of their children’s youth sport experience,” she says. “Parents get swept away in their children’s performances and youth sport experiences. They lose that healthy mental distance they might be able to use in other contexts.” 

That’s an argument for more government regulation. Koller would like to see a national standard, with “baseline levels for safety, including regulations for those who coach, making sure that there are background checks, that there are minimum competencies that coaches have to possess,” she says. 

That’s easier said than done. 

There’s a general mindset that government has no place regulating the creative and competitive world of athletics. “That might make sense when you’re talking about professional football, where athletes are protected by their union. But to take that mentality and apply it to youth sports is problematic,” she says. 

At the same time, parents’ rights advocates are for the most part in knee-jerk opposition to government involvement in youth sports. But the idea here isn’t to rob parents of their decision-making authority, Koller says: It’s to protect the kids. 

“I regularly hear from parents who are shocked that nobody’s regulating this or making sure the coach has any ability to coach,” she says. “The government doesn’t need to run Little League in order to set some minimum safety standards for the people who do run Little League.” 

As Koller looks to elevate these issues within the legal community, and with the public at large, she expresses gratitude to UBalt Law for giving her the freedom to pursue this once-unrecognized field. 

“I have been able to do this scholarship because of the University of Baltimore law school’s support,” she says. “Because the University of Baltimore believed in me, I’ve really been able to develop as a scholar, and to contribute to the field. All of that is a result of the University of Baltimore’s standing behind me and encouraging me. I have the career that I have because of this institution.” 

Adam Stone is a writer based in Annapolis.
Photo by Larry Canner.

Share this story with your network:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email

Charles Tiefer: Scholar, Teacher, Mentor

By amy e. sloan

Charles Tiefer
Prof. Charles Tiefer appears on C-SPAN in June 2012

If I had to describe Professor Emeritus Charles Tiefer in one word … I couldn’t do it! In his many years at the University of Baltimore School of Law, Professor Tiefer has been a scholar, public servant, teacher, mentor and friend. It would be impossible to reduce his contributions to our community to a single word. 

Professor Tiefer began teaching at the law school in 1995. Over the course of his career, he produced an impressive body of scholarship. He has written books, law review articles, and dozens of articles in the popular press and on Forbes.com.  

His Congressional Practice and Procedure book is the definitive work on Congressional procedure. His other books include The Polarized Congress: The Post-Traditional Procedure of Its Current Struggles (University Press of America, 2016); Government Contracting Law in the 21st Century (Carolina Academic Press, 2012); and The Semi-Sovereign Presidency: The Bush Administration’s Strategy for Governing Without Congress (Westview Press, 1994).  

His articles have appeared in prestigious journals such as Harvard Journal on Legislation, Yale Journal on Human Rights Law and Development, Stanford Journal of International Law, and Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, to name just a few. 

His many posts on Forbes.com have received hundreds of thousands of views. Receiving 10,000 views was just a regular day at the office for him. One post on Hillary Clinton’s emails received over 250,000 views. Consequently, in 2018 he was recognized with the faculty scholarship award for Excellence in Public Discourse.  

His work extended beyond the academy. Throughout his career he has been a dedicated public servant. Before he became a law professor, he was acting general counsel and solicitor and deputy general counsel to the U.S. House of Representatives. After he joined the law faculty, he continued his public service. He provided testimony to Congress on a wide range of issues. From 2008-2011, he served as a commissioner on the congressionally chartered federal Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan. He took a lead role in two dozen televised hearings, and he went on official missions to Iraq and Afghanistan concerning wartime procurement.

***

Professor Tiefer has also been a devoted classroom teacher. He taught Contracts I and II, Government Contracts Seminar, Legislation, and Secured Transactions. Numerous students expressed appreciation over the years for his clear explanations of the law. (They were somewhat less enthusiastic about his infamous multiple-multiple-choice questions that required figuring out two right answers instead of just one!)  

More recently, during the COVID19 pandemic, he devoted many hours to preparing PowerPoint slides to transition his teaching from the in-person classroom to Zoom. Teaching effectively online was a challenge for many law professors, but Professor Tiefer was more than equal to the task. His students so appreciated his efforts that they created a video tribute that they presented to him at the end of one semester. 

This long list of accomplishments does not fully capture what Professor Tiefer has meant to the UBalt Law community. He is more than a scholar, public servant, and teacher. He has been a mentor and a friend. 

When I was assigned to teach Contracts for the first time, Professor Tiefer took the initiative to reach out to me about the course. He generously shared all of his teaching materials, everything from notes to old exams to supplementary materials. He patiently answered my many questions. Over subsequent semesters, we became teaching partners, sharing materials, hypotheticals, and entertaining stories. (And for those who may be wondering, yes, contract law can be entertaining, like the case that addressed whether an emoji can manifest acceptance.) Professor Barbara White had a similar experience when she began teaching Secured Transactions. 

These examples typify the ways Professor Tiefer supported his colleagues. He would send notes of appreciation when someone helped him with a task. He made a point of seeking people out for lunch or coffee to talk about politics, scholarship, teaching, and life. And when those conversations inspired him, as they often did, he would jot down notes in a small notebook he carried in his shirt pocket so he would be sure to remember the ideas. 

In the spring, the faculty voted to award Professor Tiefer the status of Professor of Law Emeritus. It’s an honor he unquestionably deserves. I and the rest of the faculty wish him all the best in his retirement. Charles, we will miss you! 

Amy E. Sloan is a professor at UBalt School of Law.

Share this story with your network:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email

Katie Curran O’Malley Turns Her Passion for Women’s Rights into a New Career

By Christianna McCausland 

Katie Curran O’Malley
Katie Curran O’Malley

In January 2024, Katie Curran O’Malley, J.D. ’91, became the executive director of the Women’s Law Center (WLC). Within a week she was in Annapolis with another colleague, advocating for bills related to access to women’s reproductive healthcare and wage equality. Despite O’Malley’s extensive legal career, it was the first time she had ever testified in front of a legislative hearing.

“I could tell that the legislators really respected the opinions of the Women’s Law Center,” she says. “I think it’s because we’ve had such great lawyers who have been there over the years for really important bills, and when we go, they pay attention. I want to make sure we continue to do that.”

Being at the forefront of women’s rights has been a hallmark of O’Malley’s career. She began as a law clerk and then a prosecutor in Baltimore County, working for 13 years on “every case imaginable,” from robbery to white-collar crime. But she had her sights set on the bench.

“I appeared before so many judges that set a good example for me, I knew I wanted to do that,” she says. “The judges I wanted to be like afforded the parties the opportunity to be heard, were respectful, were knowledgeable of the law, and made sure everyone had a fair chance.”

In 2001, when Gov. Parris Glendening appointed her an associate district court judge for Baltimore City (a position she held for 20 years), she wanted to model the best of what she’d seen in the courtroom, having witnessed the worst, particularly in cases of intimate partner violence.

“As a young prosecutor, I didn’t like the way the victims were being treated. I thought they were being revictimized by going through the criminal justice system,” she says. “When someone would take the step and be willing to testify to the abuse they were receiving, they would be treated so poorly [by the court], they weren’t going to come back.”

O’Malley says that while judges must always be unbiased, domestic violence cases require context and special scrutiny because, if handled poorly, it could mean someone’s life. “You need to balance a person’s need for safety and some else’s need for liberty, and you don’t want to get the balance wrong,” she says. She saw such a need for judges to understand how to approach these cases that she, along with judges (all now retired) and fellow UBalt Law alumni Christopher Panos, J.D. ’89, Joann Ellinghaus-Jones, J.D. ’81, and Alexandra “Sandy” Williams, J.D. ’81, created best-practices training for new judges. Working with the National Council for Juvenile and Family Court Judges, she taught best practices in domestic violence cases around the country.

A Way of Life

O’Malley speaks at an ERA rally in Annapolis

O’Malley is a woman who likes to be busy. It’s a work ethic she says she got from her parents. She has raised four children and balanced her own career with the demands of that of her husband Martin, who was both mayor of Baltimore City and governor of Maryland, as well as a candidate for U.S. president. (He’s now the commissioner of the Social Security Administration.)

When she opted for law school, UBalt was the only school she applied to, not just because her father, J. Joseph Curran Jr., LL.B. ’59, was an alumnus, but because she needed a night school option so she could balance school and her job in finance. It’s not surprising then that when she retired from the judiciary in 2021, she was not planning to slow down.

In 2022, she ran for Maryland attorney general (the position her father once held). When she lost the election, the job at WLC emerged, and it seemed to her the perfect blend of her interests in advocacy and law.

Hon. Barbara Baer Waxman, J.D. ’80, now retired, has known O’Malley since she was a prosecutor and has watched her emerge as an expert in the field of domestic violence. She says O’Malley “is passionate. She cares. This is not a job, it’s a way of life for her.”

Waxman says the WLC job is a perfect fit for O’Malley because she brings so much knowledge to the position and is no longer constrained by a position in the judiciary. “As judges, we are hugely limited in how much we can do in advocacy,” Waxman explains. “Katie brings passion and the background of all she’s seen and learned, and now she has the ability to effectuate real change — both legislatively and one-on-one with victims’ rights.”  

At the Women’s Law Center, O’Malley oversees a staff of 20. In addition to legislative advocacy, the center has numerous programs and services, including free legal representation for those seeking protective orders, and no-cost access to family law attorneys, which would be cost- prohibitive for many of WLC’s clients. There are programs specific to the needs of foreign-born victims of domestic violence and sexual assault, to ensure equal protection under the law, and WLC’s statewide hotlines—one for employment law, one for family law—are staffed by experienced attorneys who provide information free of charge to callers.

Interesting given O’Malley’s background, WLC is also part of the state’s judicial selection process, which means they interview prospective new judges and make recommendations to the selection committee.

O’Malley says she loves that WLC gives her the opportunity to interact with other attorneys, and she particularly loves the energy of young lawyers. She should, as three of her four children are lawyers. Although she and Martin are both very busy, she says they love to travel. And her garden and rescue chihuahua help keep her balanced.

O’Malley says the world of law, both for young female lawyers and for clients, has changed since she first walked into a courtroom. But it’s still far from an equitable place, and one gets the sense O’Malley sees a lot of improvements she’d like to see in the legal system.

“I do think things have gotten better,” she says, “but you can never be complacent.”

Christianna McCausland  is a writer based in Baltimore.

Share this story with your network:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email

Alexander Giles Navigates the Depths of Maritime Law in Baltimore and Beyond

By Adam Stone

When the Key Bridge came down, Alexander Giles, J.D. ’97, got busy. He’s leveraging a broad range of legal skills to help multiple clients navigate their respective parts of that Mar. 26, 2024, disaster.  

It’s perhaps not surprising that Giles should find himself in this position. Maritime law seems to have been his destiny. 

“My dad was in the Coast Guard for 24 years. He served in Vietnam and retired in 1991, which was right before I went to law school,” he says. In his second year at UBalt Law, Giles took a maritime law class and knew he’d found his fit. “It was serendipity.” 

His instructor introduced him to a maritime lawyer at Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, and he’s never looked back. Now at Tydings & Rosenberg, he’s one of the premier maritime attorneys in the nation. 

Giles says he represents “the 800-pound gorillas in the Port of Baltimore, the most obvious one being Ports America Chesapeake.” The other emerging heavyweight is Tradepoint Atlantic. 

Among these big players, maritime legal issues can run the gamut. “Think about all the laws that affect people on land. You have all of that in maritime law, you’re just dealing with ocean commerce. You’re dealing with incidents that happen on the water,” he says. 

In practical terms, “it’s anything from corporate-type issues to personal injury to cargo damage,” he says. “You can have employment law issues, workers’ comp issues, wrongful death issues, personal injury issues, contract issues, theft of cargo, and criminal actions as well.” 

With the collapse of the Key Bridge, Giles has had to bring all those skills to the table. 

“I’ve got several clients that are involved. Ports America, for example, is where the ship that struck the bridge left from, and that’s where the ship had been docked. They don’t have any suspected liability, but with the NTSB and U.S. Coast Guard and FBI investigations, there were a lot of touchpoints in terms of what they knew, and what they didn’t know,” he says. 

Tradepoint Atlantic stepped in when the bridge went down, paving lots to use as laydown space for all the steel that needed to be moved from the channel. They also agreed to take and unload numerous ships destined for other terminals located inside the Key Bridge. Another client, McAllister Towing, had two tugs guiding the M/V Dali, the massive container ship that struck the bridge, during the early morning hours in question. 

“The tugs were released by the pilot about 20 minutes before the ship hit the bridge, so they should not have any liability or exposure,” he says. But with repairs estimated at $1.9 billion, “there’s a big delta there between what sort of money may be available from litigation, as opposed to what money is needed to rebuild the bridge.” 

That means he has a lot of work to do to demonstrate that his client is not, and should not be, on the hook for any of that funding. 

In an incident as big as this one, Giles says, “It could be its own bar exam in terms of all the legal issues that are involved,” he says. To succeed as a lawyer in this environment, “You have to have a broad knowledge of all the laws that could be implicated. You need to know all the issues, because the issues all impact each other.” 

Water and Wind

The Key Bridge incident is only one of the things keeping Giles busy these days. He’s also deeply involved in the legal work needed to bring to life offshore wind farms off the Maryland coast. Here, too, complexity is a dominant theme. 

“There are a lot of pieces that go into making offshore wind successful,” he says. “My involvement has been on the maritime side: In terms of assessing navigability, pathways for commercial vessels, and how the lease space affects or doesn’t affect those pathways.” 

The U.S. Coast Guard is involved, and the Jones Act also comes into play. That’s a federal law requiring goods shipped between U.S. ports to be transported on ships that are built, owned and operated by Americans. The law will impact what vessels may be used for the anticipated construction and installation of offshore wind turbines. 

Offshore wind power “is going to happen in Maryland, just like it will in all the other states up and down the East Coast. It’s just going to take a little time,” he says. 

Giles says his University of Baltimore experience prepared him well for the demands of a career in maritime law. 

“One of the reasons I chose University of Baltimore was because it had a reputation of looking at things from a practical standpoint: Here’s how you practice law, but here’s what really happens,” he says. 

“In my three years of law school I learned what happens in court, what happens when you work up a case, how to achieve the best result for your client — both from a legal perspective and also a business perspective,” he says. That kind of education “really helped me understand how to be effective for my clients.” 

Adam Stone is a writer based in Annapolis.
Photo by Larry Canner.

Share this story with your network:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email