We hope that you are enjoying reading about so many UBalt Law alumni who are now leading the way in the Maryland and D.C. legal communities and beyond. We also hope that you enjoyed learning more about Dean LaVonda Reed, UBalt Law’s wonderful new leader, who will lead our alma mater into the future.
Our Leadership Issue highlights just a few of the leaders in our community. We know there are many more, and we want to take this opportunity to celebrate our entire vast network of alumni who are leading and making a difference in so many fields, including legal practice, public service, nonprofits, higher education, and business.
At the law school, our amazing students also continue to learn key leadership skills starting at orientation – they, too, will most certainly go on to lead. Our alumni network of leaders is impressive and growing, and UBalt Law will help continue that growth.
As we prepared to celebrate new leadership at UBalt Law and all of our alumni leaders, we started thinking about how lawyers are called upon in great numbers to lead. Whether in practice working with clients and colleagues, or in leadership positions in business and nonprofits, those with a J.D. are often seen as leaders and tapped for leadership roles and positions.
Leadership is a journey, and leaders need learning, mentorship and reflection opportunities along the way. During my own leadership journey – one that began at UBalt Law and most recently led me back to a leadership role at our alma mater – I’ve benefitted from all of the above. Not all lawyers in or considering leadership roles receive the benefit of formal learning and reflection opportunities. In the coming years, UBalt Law will look to offer more opportunities to empower our community members to envision themselves as leaders at every level, and to unlock and develop their leadership potential.
As a first step, whether you are thinking about embarking on your leadership journey or are already in a leadership role, we hope you will join us for our “Lawyers as Leaders” lunch-and-learn series this fall. This three-part series will cover essential leadership topics such as authentic leadership style (Panel 1 – September 13; learn more and register); change management (Panel 2 – October 11, learn more and register); and building and maintaining a positive climate and culture (Panel 3 – November 15, learn more and register).
Our panelists are an impressive group of alumni leaders ready to share their wisdom. Special thanks to two alumni leaders who have worked with me to build out the series and who will moderate panels –D. Jill Green (J.D. ’94; Panel 1, September 13), and Laurie Lyte (J.D. ’92; Panels 2 and 3, October 11 and November 15). Both have deep leadership experience and passion for developing leaders, and we are so grateful they have brought their energy and expertise back to their alma mater.
Congratulations again to all of our alumni leaders – those who are featured in the Leadership Issue and beyond, including all of our Lawyers as Leaders panelists and moderators. Thank you for all you are doing to make your community a better place. Your journeys are inspiring and continue to grow our pride in UBalt Law – a law school where you learn to practice and lead. To all of our alumni leaders and aspiring leaders, let’s continue on our leadership journeys together by continuing to learn from each other and refine our skills. Looking forward to seeing you at our fall Lawyers as Leaders lunch-and-learn panels.
Joy Gaslevic, J.D. ’99, is associate dean for administration at the UBalt School of Law.
If I had to describe Professor Emeritus Charles Tiefer in one word … I couldn’t do it! In his many years at the University of Baltimore School of Law, Professor Tiefer has been a scholar, public servant, teacher, mentor and friend. It would be impossible to reduce his contributions to our community to a single word.
Professor Tiefer began teaching at the law school in 1995. Over the course of his career, he produced an impressive body of scholarship. He has written books, law review articles, and dozens of articles in the popular press and on Forbes.com.
His Congressional Practice and Procedure book is the definitive work on Congressional procedure. His other books include The Polarized Congress: The Post-Traditional Procedure of Its Current Struggles (University Press of America, 2016); Government Contracting Law in the 21st Century (Carolina Academic Press, 2012); and The Semi-Sovereign Presidency: The Bush Administration’s Strategy for Governing Without Congress (Westview Press, 1994).
His articles have appeared in prestigious journals such as Harvard Journal on Legislation, Yale Journal on Human Rights Law and Development,Stanford Journal of International Law, and Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, to name just a few.
His many posts on Forbes.com have received hundreds of thousands of views. Receiving 10,000 views was just a regular day at the office for him. One post on Hillary Clinton’s emails received over 250,000 views. Consequently, in 2018 he was recognized with the faculty scholarship award for Excellence in Public Discourse.
His work extended beyond the academy. Throughout his career he has been a dedicated public servant. Before he became a law professor, he was acting general counsel and solicitor and deputy general counsel to the U.S. House of Representatives. After he joined the law faculty, he continued his public service. He provided testimony to Congress on a wide range of issues. From 2008-2011, he served as a commissioner on the congressionally chartered federal Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan. He took a lead role in two dozen televised hearings, and he went on official missions to Iraq and Afghanistan concerning wartime procurement.
***
Professor Tiefer has also been a devoted classroom teacher. He taught Contracts I and II, Government Contracts Seminar, Legislation, and Secured Transactions. Numerous students expressed appreciation over the years for his clear explanations of the law. (They were somewhat less enthusiastic about his infamous multiple-multiple-choice questions that required figuring out two right answers instead of just one!)
More recently, during the COVID19 pandemic, he devoted many hours to preparing PowerPoint slides to transition his teaching from the in-person classroom to Zoom. Teaching effectively online was a challenge for many law professors, but Professor Tiefer was more than equal to the task. His students so appreciated his efforts that they created a video tribute that they presented to him at the end of one semester.
This long list of accomplishments does not fully capture what Professor Tiefer has meant to the UBalt Law community. He is more than a scholar, public servant, and teacher. He has been a mentor and a friend.
When I was assigned to teach Contracts for the first time, Professor Tiefer took the initiative to reach out to me about the course. He generously shared all of his teaching materials, everything from notes to old exams to supplementary materials. He patiently answered my many questions. Over subsequent semesters, we became teaching partners, sharing materials, hypotheticals, and entertaining stories. (And for those who may be wondering, yes, contract law can be entertaining, like the case that addressed whether an emoji can manifest acceptance.) Professor Barbara White had a similar experience when she began teaching Secured Transactions.
These examples typify the ways Professor Tiefer supported his colleagues. He would send notes of appreciation when someone helped him with a task. He made a point of seeking people out for lunch or coffee to talk about politics, scholarship, teaching, and life. And when those conversations inspired him, as they often did, he would jot down notes in a small notebook he carried in his shirt pocket so he would be sure to remember the ideas.
In the spring, the faculty voted to award Professor Tiefer the status of Professor of Law Emeritus. It’s an honor he unquestionably deserves. I and the rest of the faculty wish him all the best in his retirement. Charles, we will miss you!
Amy E. Sloan is a professor at UBalt School of Law.
In January 2024, Katie Curran O’Malley, J.D. ’91, became the executive director of the Women’s Law Center (WLC). Within a week she was in Annapolis with another colleague, advocating for bills related to access to women’s reproductive healthcare and wage equality. Despite O’Malley’s extensive legal career, it was the first time she had ever testified in front of a legislative hearing.
“I could tell that the legislators really respected the opinions of the Women’s Law Center,” she says. “I think it’s because we’ve had such great lawyers who have been there over the years for really important bills, and when we go, they pay attention. I want to make sure we continue to do that.”
Being at the forefront of women’s rights has been a hallmark of O’Malley’s career. She began as a law clerk and then a prosecutor in Baltimore County, working for 13 years on “every case imaginable,” from robbery to white-collar crime. But she had her sights set on the bench.
“I appeared before so many judges that set a good example for me, I knew I wanted to do that,” she says. “The judges I wanted to be like afforded the parties the opportunity to be heard, were respectful, were knowledgeable of the law, and made sure everyone had a fair chance.”
In 2001, when Gov. Parris Glendening appointed her an associate district court judge for Baltimore City (a position she held for 20 years), she wanted to model the best of what she’d seen in the courtroom, having witnessed the worst, particularly in cases of intimate partner violence.
“As a young prosecutor, I didn’t like the way the victims were being treated. I thought they were being revictimized by going through the criminal justice system,” she says. “When someone would take the step and be willing to testify to the abuse they were receiving, they would be treated so poorly [by the court], they weren’t going to come back.”
O’Malley says that while judges must always be unbiased, domestic violence cases require context and special scrutiny because, if handled poorly, it could mean someone’s life. “You need to balance a person’s need for safety and some else’s need for liberty, and you don’t want to get the balance wrong,” she says. She saw such a need for judges to understand how to approach these cases that she, along with judges (all now retired) and fellow UBalt Law alumni Christopher Panos, J.D. ’89, Joann Ellinghaus-Jones, J.D. ’81, and Alexandra “Sandy” Williams, J.D. ’81, created best-practices training for new judges. Working with the National Council for Juvenile and Family Court Judges, she taught best practices in domestic violence cases around the country.
A Way of Life
O’Malley is a woman who likes to be busy. It’s a work ethic she says she got from her parents. She has raised four children and balanced her own career with the demands of that of her husband Martin, who was both mayor of Baltimore City and governor of Maryland, as well as a candidate for U.S. president. (He’s now the commissioner of the Social Security Administration.)
When she opted for law school, UBalt was the only school she applied to, not just because her father, J. Joseph Curran Jr., LL.B. ’59, was an alumnus, but because she needed a night school option so she could balance school and her job in finance. It’s not surprising then that when she retired from the judiciary in 2021, she was not planning to slow down.
In 2022, she ran for Maryland attorney general (the position her father once held). When she lost the election, the job at WLC emerged, and it seemed to her the perfect blend of her interests in advocacy and law.
Hon. Barbara Baer Waxman, J.D. ’80, now retired, has known O’Malley since she was a prosecutor and has watched her emerge as an expert in the field of domestic violence. She says O’Malley “is passionate. She cares. This is not a job, it’s a way of life for her.”
Waxman says the WLC job is a perfect fit for O’Malley because she brings so much knowledge to the position and is no longer constrained by a position in the judiciary. “As judges, we are hugely limited in how much we can do in advocacy,” Waxman explains. “Katie brings passion and the background of all she’s seen and learned, and now she has the ability to effectuate real change — both legislatively and one-on-one with victims’ rights.”
At the Women’s Law Center, O’Malley oversees a staff of 20. In addition to legislative advocacy, the center has numerous programs and services, including free legal representation for those seeking protective orders, and no-cost access to family law attorneys, which would be cost- prohibitive for many of WLC’s clients. There are programs specific to the needs of foreign-born victims of domestic violence and sexual assault, to ensure equal protection under the law, and WLC’s statewide hotlines—one for employment law, one for family law—are staffed by experienced attorneys who provide information free of charge to callers.
Interesting given O’Malley’s background, WLC is also part of the state’s judicial selection process, which means they interview prospective new judges and make recommendations to the selection committee.
O’Malley says she loves that WLC gives her the opportunity to interact with other attorneys, and she particularly loves the energy of young lawyers. She should, as three of her four children are lawyers. Although she and Martin are both very busy, she says they love to travel. And her garden and rescue chihuahua help keep her balanced.
O’Malley says the world of law, both for young female lawyers and for clients, has changed since she first walked into a courtroom. But it’s still far from an equitable place, and one gets the sense O’Malley sees a lot of improvements she’d like to see in the legal system.
“I do think things have gotten better,” she says, “but you can never be complacent.”
Christianna McCausland is a writer based in Baltimore.
When the Key Bridge came down, Alexander Giles, J.D. ’97, got busy. He’s leveraging a broad range of legal skills to help multiple clients navigate their respective parts of that Mar. 26, 2024, disaster.
It’s perhaps not surprising that Giles should find himself in this position. Maritime law seems to have been his destiny.
“My dad was in the Coast Guard for 24 years. He served in Vietnam and retired in 1991, which was right before I went to law school,” he says. In his second year at UBalt Law, Giles took a maritime law class and knew he’d found his fit. “It was serendipity.”
His instructor introduced him to a maritime lawyer atSemmes, Bowen & Semmes, and he’s never looked back. Now at Tydings & Rosenberg, he’s one of the premier maritime attorneys in the nation.
Giles says he represents “the 800-pound gorillas in the Port of Baltimore, the most obvious one being Ports America Chesapeake.” The other emerging heavyweight is Tradepoint Atlantic.
Among these big players, maritime legal issues can run the gamut. “Think about all the laws that affect people on land. You have all of that in maritime law, you’re just dealing with ocean commerce. You’re dealing with incidents that happen on the water,” he says.
In practical terms, “it’s anything from corporate-type issues to personal injury to cargo damage,” he says. “You can have employment law issues, workers’ comp issues, wrongful death issues, personal injury issues, contract issues, theft of cargo, and criminal actions as well.”
With the collapse of the Key Bridge, Giles has had to bring all those skills to the table.
“I’ve got several clients that are involved. Ports America, for example, is where the ship that struck the bridge left from, and that’s where the ship had been docked. They don’t have any suspected liability, but with the NTSB and U.S. Coast Guard and FBI investigations, there were a lot of touchpoints in terms of what they knew, and what they didn’t know,” he says.
Tradepoint Atlantic stepped in when the bridge went down, paving lots to use as laydown space for all the steel that needed to be moved from the channel. They also agreed to take and unload numerous ships destined for other terminals located inside the Key Bridge. Another client, McAllister Towing, had two tugs guiding the M/V Dali, the massive container ship that struck the bridge, during the early morning hours in question.
“The tugs were released by the pilot about 20 minutes before the ship hit the bridge, so they should not have any liability or exposure,” he says. But with repairs estimated at $1.9 billion, “there’s a big delta there between what sort of money may be available from litigation, as opposed to what money is needed to rebuild the bridge.”
That means he has a lot of work to do to demonstrate that his client is not, and should not be, on the hook for any of that funding.
In an incident as big as this one, Giles says, “It could be its own bar exam in terms of all the legal issues that are involved,” he says. To succeed as a lawyer in this environment, “You have to have a broad knowledge of all the laws that could be implicated. You need to know all the issues, because the issues all impact each other.”
Water and Wind
The Key Bridge incident is only one of the things keeping Giles busy these days. He’s also deeply involved in the legal work needed to bring to life offshore wind farms off the Maryland coast. Here, too, complexity is a dominant theme.
“There are a lot of pieces that go into making offshore wind successful,” he says. “My involvement has been on the maritime side: In terms of assessing navigability, pathways for commercial vessels, and how the lease space affects or doesn’t affect those pathways.”
The U.S. Coast Guard is involved, and the Jones Act also comes into play. That’s a federal law requiring goods shipped between U.S. ports to be transported on ships that are built, owned and operated by Americans. The law will impact what vessels may be used for the anticipated construction and installation of offshore wind turbines.
Offshore wind power “is going to happen in Maryland, just like it will in all the other states up and down the East Coast. It’s just going to take a little time,” he says.
Giles says his University of Baltimore experience prepared him well for the demands of a career in maritime law.
“One of the reasons I chose University of Baltimore was because it had a reputation of looking at things from a practical standpoint: Here’s how you practice law, but here’s what really happens,” he says.
“In my three years of law school I learned what happens in court, what happens when you work up a case, how to achieve the best result for your client — both from a legal perspective and also a business perspective,” he says. That kind of education “really helped me understand how to be effective for my clients.”
Adam Stone is a writer based in Annapolis. Photo by Larry Canner.
Prof. Nienke Grossman, co-director of the University of Baltimore’s Center for International and Comparative Law, was reelected to a second term on the Inter-American Juridical Committee (IAJC) at the 54th OAS General Assembly in Asuncion, Paraguay, on June 28, 2024. Grossman is the first woman and the first Latina nominated by the United States and elected to serve on the committee, and one of only eight women to serve on the committee since 1942.
The committee serves the Organization of American States in an advisory capacity and promotes the progressive development and codification of international law. Its members are distinguished international law experts from across the Inter-American region. Grossman was elected to the panel in January 2024 and sought reelection to a full four-year term.
OAS leadership cited Grossman for her knowledge and experience as an international law scholar and advisor on a wide range of international law topics, including her expertise in issues involving women and international law. “I am honored to have been nominated by the United States, and elected by OAS member states, to serve on the IAJC,” says Grossman. “I look forward to continuing to work with my colleagues on the committee to provide effective and useful advice on juridical matters to the OAS, and to working with States to advance the rule of law in the region.”
The United States’ support for her candidacy and that of many other women elected to international bodies in the past year shows a commitment to advancing policies that promote gender equality and empower women within the OAS and beyond. These efforts to support her election also advance Sustainable Development Goal 5.5, which seeks to ensures women’s full and effective participation and equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making in political, economic and public life.
The University of Baltimore School of Law’s finalist team in the Pace University Elisabeth Haub School of Law Environmental Law and Policy Hack Competition finished first in the nation for its brief and presentation, “Achieving a Circular Economy for Textile Waste in Baltimore City: Improving a Significant Public-Private Partnership Through Targeted Legal Reform.” The virtual competition took place on April 19, 2024.
This national competition challenges law students across the nation to propose innovative legal solutions to environmental and social issues facing our country. This year, the competition prompted students to address the issue of household waste at the regional, subnational or national scale. The UBalt Law team focused on the increasing concerns surrounding household textiles (clothing, durable fabric goods, etc.) and the waste and environmental justice concerns associated with them in Baltimore City and Maryland more broadly, says 3L and team leader James Duffy.
The Pace Competition allows finalist teams to present their proposals to a panel of expert judges and rewards the first-place team with a $2,000 grant to implement proposed solutions.
The Baltimore Law team consisted of students pictured: front row, from left, JamesDuffy and Jessica Kweon; middle row, from left: Adam Fetian, Hannah Krehely and Cameron Luzarraga; back row, from left: Abby Badro, Carmen Perry, Paige Lauenstein and Spencer Baldacci.
The team was coached by UBalt Law Prof. Sonya Ziaja; Lisa Scianella, chief of staff from Helpsy, for contributing a wealth of knowledge and feedback on proposed solutions; and law alumni Lisa Blitstein, J.D. ’22, and Grant Foehrkolb, J.D. ’14.
Peter Angelos, LL.B. ’61, the longtime owner of the Baltimore Orioles, a leader of the legal community and a major financial supporter of his alma mater, passed away on March 23, 2024, following a long illness. He was 94.
Mr. Angelos was a true friend of the University, giving more than $18 million during his lifetime, including a total gift of $15 million for the University’s law center building named in honor of his parents. Standing tall over the intersection of Charles Street and Mt. Royal Avenue, the John and Frances Angelos Law Center is an iconic structure for both the University and central Baltimore.
The Angelos name also is prominent in the law school’s academic programming, with the Fannie Angelos Program for Academic Excellence serving as a nationally acclaimed model to encourage diversity in the development of lawyers and the practice of law. Fannie Angelos, L.L.B. ’51, Peter’s sister and a practitioner in his family’s law firm, was a champion of such efforts. She graduated from UBalt Law in 1951, one of three women in her class. She died in 2015.
In the 1990s, Mr. Angelos and his law firm organized multiple class-action lawsuits against asbestos manufacturers, winning more than $1 billion in damages for pipefitters, steelworkers and their families. Commissions from this work allowed him to purchase the baseball team in 1993.
Photo credit: (Algerina Perna/Baltimore Sun/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)
When George Weber, J.D. ’13, was attending UBalt Law, the Arab Spring was in full swing. “I was taking classes in foreign relations law and international criminal law, so I was very interested in it,” he says.
Weber took his interest beyond the classroom, becoming a fellow with the Center for International and Comparative Law (CICL). There he helped organize symposia and dove deep into the complexities of the international legal landscape. “It was central to my UBalt experience,” says Weber, who is now an attorney-adviser at the Federal Communications Commission.
This year marks the 30th anniversary of CICL, a prestigious, nationally recognized center for international and comparative law scholarship. Founded in 1994 as the first research center in the law school, and one of the first research centers in the University of Baltimore, CICL leaders call this milestone a moment for celebration.
A global perspective
As it works to promote the study and practice of international law, CICL works directly with governments, non-governmental organizations and reform movements — “anyone who might have an interest in trying to advance international law,” says Prof. Mortimer “Tim” Sellers, director of the center.
Arguably, that could include almost everyone. As a legal system, “international law regulates the entire world,” Sellers says. It governs “how states interact with each other, with international institutions and even how states relate to their own citizens.”
That encompasses human rights, the conduct of war, trade and commerce. “All that has become more important as the world has gotten more integrated, as more and more things happen that cross international boundaries,” he says. Climate change is an obvious example: It’s a global phenomenon that demands a multi-national response.
In elevating the study of international law, CICL has helped other nations to thrive. The center’s direct work with the government of Brazil since the 1990s has strengthened democracy there, while in-person and institutional involvement in Ukraine — including participation at a major conference celebrating Lviv University’s special role in international law, and in reviving and working with the National University of Kiv Mohyla Academy — is assisting in its efforts to win global support amid the Russian invasion.
Closer to home, the center’s work has enriched the work of both faculty and students at UBalt Law.
Hand-on learning and engagement
As co-director of the Center, Prof. Nienke Grossman says CICL aims to creates opportunities for engagement with international law issues “both in theory and in practice.”
As a leading scholar working at the intersection of international law and women’s rights, she has involved students in hands-on projects. Last year, she and her students worked with the UN Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and she and a student traveled to the United Nations to support the Rapporteur’s work.
Her students also have engaged with the Free Yazidi Foundation, a non-governmental organization working on issues involving Yazidi women, who are part of an often-persecuted religious minority in the Middle East. “We had two students who interviewed members of the Yazidi community on the issue of forced child marriage in their communities, in both Iraq and Nebraska,” she says.
Grossman’s own credentials in international law run deep. For example, she was recently nominated by the United States and elected by member states of the Organization of American States to the Inter-American Juridical Committee, a body of 11 experts on public and private international law in the region. She is the first woman and Latina to serve on the Committee from the United States. Her scholarship on women and international law, feminist approaches, and international courts and tribunals is found in top international law journals and publications, and she is currently co-editing the Oxford Handbook on Women in International Law.
Sellers likewise is a highly lauded scholar in the field. He’s served as editor of a book series from the American Society of Comparative Law, and of the International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law.
Through the scholarly work of its leaders, CICL has impacted the efforts of UBalt Law faculty across a wide range of disciplines over the past 30 years, such as constitutional law, criminal law, and commercial transactions.
“Family law very often has an international or transnational component. There are a great number of people who have transnational marriages, or at least have a foot in one country or another besides the United States,” Sellers says. “It’s hard to imagine any aspect of law that doesn’t have an international component,” he says.
CICL’s executive director, Janet Lord, agrees. “Lawyers today ignore international law at their peril. Representation of a client in a family law matter may very well intersect with foreign and international law, due to property or custody elements.” And as Sellers emphasizes, trade obviously crosses national lines, as do criminal activities and the protection of the environment.
A new generation
Looking ahead, a rising generation of faculty are helping to ensure that CICL remains preeminent in the field.
“We recently hired Prof. Ioanna Tourkochoriti, a highly respected comparative law scholar and an expert on freedom of speech,” says Sellers. “Prof. Anne-Marie Carstenshas joined our law faculty and is doing good work on cultural property. And Prof. Sonya Ziaja is an international environmental law scholar. Our future lies in these newer voices.”
Executive director Lord, who joined the Center in 2023, brings both a deep record of international legal practice and a track record of scholarly publications and recognition as a leading expert on international disability rights law.
“My focus at this juncture in my career is to help build the competence and confidence of our students in international law. Our proximity to the UN in New York, and to multiple institutions in Washington, D.C., helps make that possible,” she says. Lord looks forward to the coming academic year, when CICL fellows will produce legal analysis for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, support international criminal law advocacy at the UN, and work on collaborative research with our partner, the Harvard Law School Project on Disability.
Center leadership is proud of its accomplished past and ambitious future. “CICL has made substantial contributions to the law school, and it continues to do so, bringing renowned scholars and practitioners to campus and giving the community an opportunity to think beyond Baltimore, beyond Maryland, and even beyond the United States,” Grossman says.
Sellers describes the anniversary as a chance to reflect not just on the achievements of the center, but upon the vital role of international law as a discipline.
“In the absence of law, you have lives that are nasty, brutish, and short,” he says. International law, in particular, “gives us a way of coordinating our activities so that our lives are not a fountain of violence and corruption. It’s the line between barbarism and civilization.”
“What we’re doing at CICL is promoting civilization. If you want to have a peaceful and just world, the only way you can achieve it is through law.”
The 2023 Distinguished Alumni Awards were presented at a sold-out dinner on May 25, 2023. The winners were chosen by the UBalt Law Alumni Association based on nominations submitted by alumni and the public. Congratulations to the honorees!
The winners were:
Byron L. Warnken Memorial Alumni Award: Taren Butcher, J.D. ’07
Dean’s Award: Samuel G. Rose, LL.B. ’62
Distinguished Judicial Award: Hon. Barbara Waxman, J.D. ’80
On March 10, 2023, the University of Baltimore Law Review hosted “The Quest for Progressive Antitrust,” a special symposium celebrating the career of Venable ProfessorRobert H. Lande, who retired earlier this year.
Lande was co-founder of the American Antitrust Institute, past chair of the Association of American Law Schools Antitrust Section, an award-winning scholar, and a leading intellectual force behind the 21st century’s reinvigorated antitrust movement.
Distinguished antitrust scholars, practitioners, policymakers and reform advocates participated in panel discussions addressing competition policy, antitrust law, and Lande’s vital role in shaping the national debate about the need to protect consumers from cartels and monopoly power. Lande also delivered a keynote address.
Welcome remarks were delivered by Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Jonathan Kanter and U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar. Panelists included Randy M. Stutz, of the Federal Trade Commission; Albert Foer, founder and past president of the American Antitrust Institute; and Katherine Van Dyck, of the American Economic Liberties Project.