In Closing: Assistant Dean For Admissions Michelle Gunter

By Michelle Gunter

When I joined the University of Baltimore School of Law in January 2023, I knew I had committed to a unique and dynamic institution. After a decade working in higher education at public and private institutions, I have seen many changes in how we approach students, the admissions process, and legal education itself. While some changes can be good, others have created challenges that require us to reimagine how we approach admissions.  

Since 1925, the School of Law has produced thousands of leaders for our city, state and nation. While the face of the legal field is always changing, from the integration of artificial intelligence to cybersecurity regulation, the goals of our applicants – and UBalt Law — remain the same. Our law school is increasingly reflective of the communities we serve, and it’s exciting to see how this impacts legal education and the legal profession.  

Today, our students come through the door with challenges that affect how we approach admissions and legal education. They experienced much of their education during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, they didn’t have the same access to internships, practical experiences and in-person education. Their resumes aren’t as full as those of past applicants, and confidence is lagging. Many struggle with anxiety and other mental health issues.  

As undergraduate education removed SAT and ACT requirements, students arrive less experienced with standardized tests. Yet, with all of these differences between our applicants and our alumni, our students have meaningful life experiences and diverse perspectives that bring passion to their academic work. 

With the introduction of the GRE as a widely used admissions exam, and the online version of the LSAT being offered more than four times a year, the admissions process adapts to these changes. As we face new challenges in fulfilling diversity goals, we continue to refine our processes to ensure success.  

Despite the recent Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action, we will continue enrolling classes that reflect our diverse community. We will continue to develop lawyer-leaders who change our communities for the better. Our classes are more diverse than ever before. The entering class for Fall 2023 is approximately 43 percent diverse. This represents an increase of almost 20 percent since 2013.  

More women have decided to take the law school journey. Just 10 years ago, our student body was primarily male. Today, our enrollment is over 60 percent women.  

Our entering class arrived at August orientation representing 30 states and 114 undergraduate institutions. While the majority of our class still hails from Maryland, they are bringing worlds of experience to our classrooms. With a new group of students come new opportunities. More and more students are first-generation, and they are eager to explore the varied landscape of the legal field.  In this new world, they will require mentorship from practicing lawyers who remember their own journey through law school.  

As the new class gets acclimated, my Admissions team and I will travel the country recruiting new students, talking about the phenomenal experiences each student will gain, and the alumni connections that will support them along the way. Technology allows us to reach students who might otherwise know very little about UBalt Law, expanding our reach in important ways.  

As you cross paths with our prospective students and current students in your travels, we ask that you point them in the right direction. Provide the help and support you needed when you were in law school. Along with you, we look forward to what the next generation of lawyers will bring.

Michelle Gunter, Esq., is assistant dean for admissions and enrollment management at the University of Baltimore School of Law. 

Share this story with your network:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email

In Closing: Fight to Vote for the Right to Vote

Gilda R. Daniels

We must continue the fight to vote for the right to vote. The country has watched in horror as voters stood for hours, in lines six feet apart with masks and gloves, trying to cast a ballot and protect themselves from the coronavirus.

Yet these images are not new to communities of color. In fact, these are commonplace experiences for voters of color. In the age of COVID-19, voters are faced with seemingly two options: cast a ballot or catch a virus. These alternatives are symptomatic of a country and a democracy in crisis.

This crisis did not start with the coronavirus, but if we work together, we can mitigate the results. Just as we can slow the spread of the virus if we engage in certain activities, we can stop the spread of voter suppression if we adopt procedures that are free, fair and safe so that all voters can participate in the electoral process.

Stay-at-home orders have placed much of the country on lockdown and provided large swaths of people an opportunity to reflect and prepare for the days to come. We must use this time to plan for the November 3, 2020 election. Democracy is in crisis, and as with other issues facing our country, when communities of color were sounding an alarm that voter suppression was real, America decided to focus on other issues — such as the undetectable and nonexistent voter fraud claims — instead of the hundreds of thousands of voters impacted by solutions in search of a problem: voter ID, proof-of-citizenship laws and the like.

Voting by mail had been a viable option until this summer, when President Trump attacked the process as potentially fraudulent and appointed a postmaster who intentionally slowed mail delivery. How many Americans will choose to vote absentee, and how many completed ballots will be received at elections offices in time to be counted, remain concerning questions at this writing.

Even before this recent attack by the Republican Party, vote-by-mail was not widely accepted or utilized in communities of color. Additionally, in the 2018 Georgia gubernatorial election, more than 50,000 mailed ballots, primarily from voters of color, were rejected due to the state’s exact-match requirements. It is worth noting that the election was decided by approximately 55,000 votes.

Much more effective options for increasing poll access include longer periods for early voting, additional polling stations, drop boxes for ballots, and making Election Day a state holiday. Without a doubt, these measures have costs to implement. But it is imperative that we consider the damage done to democracy because of voter suppression to be an untenable outcome that must be avoided at all costs.

We the people have the power to change how we conduct elections. To realize this power, I ask people to do four things: educate, legislate, litigate and participate. We must educate ourselves and others about how to register, how to cast a ballot, and to know the deadlines for standard processes, such as voter registration and Election Day.

We also need to study candidates and their positions on issues that are meaningful to us. Additionally, legislation that impacts the right to vote and access to the voting booth must be amplified and analyzed. Many legislative actions are done in a vacuum, yet they have longstanding implications on the right to vote.

We also have an obligation to partner with organizations that fight for the right to vote, such as Advancement Project, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Demos, and Latino Justice/Puerto Rican Legal Defense & Education Fund.

Finally, we must participate, not just on Election Day, but every day. We do need poll workers and others who will work to provide nondiscriminatory access on Election Day. However, voting is more than a one-day activity. The struggle for nondiscriminatory, free and fair representation is a 24/7/365 endeavor. We must all engage in the fight to vote for the right to vote.

Gilda R. Daniels is an associate professor at the UB School of Law and director of litigation at Advancement Project National Office. She is the author of Uncounted: The Crisis of Voter Suppression in America (NYU Press, 2020) and a former deputy chief in the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Voting Section.